on the other hand, which is reduced to 'ooh', with the ommision of the word "the", and a slant to the 'h' , which is natural and lends to giving the impression of the following vowel 'a'. (The lack of "the" is because such small words like "to" and "the" are added when you read it back anyway, even if they aren't there, just as you do when you read back longhand.)
a lot of as a single character. >
The second outline shows it as a small 'l' in the 't' position, which removes the need for the first and last words altogether, you can also change this to "lots of" by adding an 's'.
I am sure (as a single outline)
in fact (with the 'f' omitted, which distinguishes it from "in effect">)
No comments:
Post a Comment